Interstate Agreement On Detainers Form 2

24 Sep Interstate Agreement On Detainers Form 2

The agreement also provides that when a prisoner applies for an order in a case for which a prisoner has been filed, it is a request for a decision on all matters for which prisoners have been filed by the same “[S]tate”. Article III(d) In this context, the different federal districts have been separately designated as `[S]tates`. See United States v. Bryant, 612 F.2d 806 (4th Cir. 1979), certificate refused, 446 U.p. 920 (1980). Prosecution of other charges that have not been the subject of any prisoner is not permitted by the agreement unless they result from the same transaction. (Article V(d)) ] It is not clear whether the examination of the latter is compulsory. Applicability of the Agreement: The Agreement applies only to “a person who has served a sentence of imprisonment in a penitentiary or penitentiary establishment” (Articles III (a) and IV (a)) and therefore does not apply to a person awaiting trial. See United States vs. Reed, 620 F.2d 709, 711-12 (9th Cir.), certificate refused, 449 U.S. refused, 449 U.p. 904 (1980).

See, however, united States vs. Scheer, 729 F.2d 164, 170 (2d Cir. 1984). The Attorney General delegated the authority to forward state requests to the Bureau of Prisons under the agreement. . . .

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.